Wind Turbine Developers Are Threatening Our Delaware and Maryland Beaches

Our precious beach is about to be changed forever if immediate action is not taken. Wind power developers plan to construct as many as two hundred 643-foot tall wind turbines along our coast between Ocean City, Maryland and Rehoboth Beach, Delaware. These towers will be visible from shore, not only during the day, but also at night due to the flashing of airplane and ship warning lights.

Little consideration has been given to the impact on your home value, your quality of life, your rental income, or your business.

Most along our beach have no idea what is about to happen. Your opinion has not been asked. Decisions are being made by others in Dover, Annapolis, Washington, and Italy. It is time for our voices to be heard.

For additional illustrations provided by the Ocean City government, click here.

What projects have been approved?

The Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC) approved two wind turbine projects to be built off the Maryland and Delaware coasts, allowing the installation of 368MW of electrical capacity. The total cost of the two projects is $2.1 billion.

The first is US Wind, a subsidiary of the Italian wind turbine manufacturer Renexia. This Italian-based company is planning to install 32 turbines as close as 17 nautical miles from our shore with a capacity of 248 MW. US Wind has discussed installing as many as 187 wind turbines in three phases.

The second is Deepwater Wind’s Skipjack Project. This project will include 15 wind turbines as close as 17 nautical miles from shore with a capacity of 120 MW.

It is believed that both companies plan to construct 8MW wind towers that are at least 643 feet tall.

Printed in The Maryland Coast Dispatch 05/11/17
Too close for comfort

The two lease areas are as close as 12.5 miles from the shoreline. As the map illustrates, US Wind plans to build in the lower lease area, while Deepwater Wind plans to build in the upper lease area.

Under most conditions, the wind turbines will be visible from the coastline. Even at 18 miles from the coast, 516 feet of a 643-foot turbine can be seen above the horizon.

Source: National Oceanographic and Aeronautical Administration (NOAA)

The Ocean City Government strongly opposes the wind turbines location

The Ocean City Mayor and City Council have openly supported clean energy, including offshore wind.  However, they have also expressed serious concerns that creating a visible industrial landscape on the ocean horizon will harm the beach economy by reducing property values, rental income, tax receipts, and tourism.

“We support whatever can be done to mitigate this situation,” said Ocean City Mayor Richard Meehan. “But the bottom line is we just don’t want citizens, the visitors, the residents, and our 26,000 non-resident property owners to be looking at the industrial view when we’re on the beach in Ocean City.”

Ocean City Mayor Richard Meehan and the Ocean City Council unanimously support the requirement that offshore wind energy turbines be built at least 26 miles off the coast of Ocean City. At this distance, the turbines would be less visible.

To learn more about Mayor Meehan’s concerns, watch this interview.

Experts say coastal tourism will suffer

A study conducted by economists at North Carolina State University determined that near shore wind turbines would have a big impact on coastal tourism.

To explore the economic impact of offshore wind farms, the researchers surveyed 484 people who had recently rented homes on the North Carolina coast in areas where the state has offshore leases available for wind farm development. Fifty-six percent of participants had rented vacation homes each of the past five years, and one-third of that 56 percent had rented the exact same house every year.

Fifty-four percent said they would not rent a vacation home if turbines were in view, no matter how large a discount was offered on the rental price.

Wind energy will increase the price of energy

Area residents and businesses will pay an additional $177,000,000 in increased electrical rates annually during the 20 year life of the project. That is $3.5 billion less purchasing power.

The wind power operators will be paid approximately 13.7 cents for each kWh they produce, which is nearly 400 percent more than the 3.5 cents per kWh that residents in the PMJ grid now pay for the wholesale price of power produced.

Few permanent jobs will be created

The US Wind proposal stated that their project would create 32 permanent operational and maintenance jobs, while Deepwater Wind stated that their project would create 37 permanent operational and maintenance jobs. Using the National Renewable Energy Laboratories Jobs and Economic Development Impact Model, the total number of permanent jobs created from both projects is approximately 50. To access this Economic Impact Model, click here.

Since the annual increase in the cost of electricity to area consumers is $177,000,000, the cost for each job created by the wind projects is $3,500,000, every year, for 20 years.

With the reduced purchasing power of residents and businesses, more jobs will be lost than the number of new jobs created.

There is no regional environmental benefit

The Maryland Public Service Commission hired a consultant to determine the air quality benefit of both projects. The consultant’s report found there would be no regional air quality benefit. Regional CO2, NOX, and SO2 emissions would actually increase because power generated by the wind turbines would mostly displace energy generated by clean natural gas-fired power plants.

According to the EPA, air quality in the United States is improving rapidly. The six common air pollutants declined a total of 67 percent from 1980 to 2016.

Bad news for coastal birds and sea life?

The WindAction Group, a group focused on informing the public about industrial wind energy, created a bird tracking study that determined some migratory paths cross areas slated for offshore wind development.

The report prepared for the Maryland Public Service Commission also stated: “A large offshore wind project will affect the local marine environment.” They recommended that an environmental impact study be commissioned.

There are additional concerns about the potential negative impact on sea life such as horseshoe crabs. The Delaware Bay has one of the largest populations of horseshoe crabs, which contribute immensely to health care testing. Vaccines, intravenous solutions, and implantable medical devices — both for humans and animals — are quality checked for safety using a test that comes from the blood of horseshoe crabs.

Additional resources

To learn more about these proposals, visit the following websites:

You must contact your local and state government officials immediately so that your voice can be heard!

If you do not act now, your view of the ocean will be forever changed. How you can help:

Reach out to your government officials who have oversight over the wind turbine projects

Maryland: Federal

US Senator Ben Cardin
202-224-4524
US Senator Chris Van Hollen
202-224-4654
Congressman Andy Harris
202-225-5311
Congressman Dutch Ruppersberger
202-225-3061

Maryland: State Legislators

Senate President Mike Miller
410-841-3700
House Speaker Mike Busch
410-841-380
Senator Joan Carter Conway
410-841-3145
Senator Craig Zucker
410-841-3625
Senator Brian Feldman
410-841-3169
Senator Kathy Klausmeier
410-841-3620
Senator Steve Hershey
410-841-3639
Senator J.B. Jennings
410-841-3706
Senator Bobby Zirkin
410-841-3131
Delegate Maggie McIntosh
410-841-3407
Delegate Tawanna Gaines
410-841-3058
Delegate Adrienne Jones
410-841-3391
Delegate Kirill Reznik
410-841-3039
Delegate Dereck Davis
410-841-3519
Delegate Ben Brooks
410-841-3352
Delegate Talmadge Branch
410-841-3398
Delegate Ben Kramer
410-841-3485
Delegate Mary Ann Lisanti
410-841-3331
Delegate Kumar Barve
410-841-3990
Delegate Dana Stein
410-841-3527
Delegate Pam Beidle
410-841-3370
Delegate Nic Kipke
(410) 841-3421
Delegate Kathy Szeliga
410-841-3698
Delegate Chris West
410-841-3793
Delegate Anne Kaiser
410-841-3036

Maryland: State Officials

Governor Larry Hogan, Jr.
410-974-3901
Lt. Governor Boyd Rutherford
(410) 974-2461
State Comptroller Peter Franchot
(443)-477-0337
State Treasurer Nancy Kopp
(410) 260-7160
Sec. of Dept. of Environment Ben Grumbles
(410) 537-3084
Sec. of Dept. of Natural Resources Mark Belton
(410) 260-8101
MD Energy Administrator Mary Beth Tung
(410) 537-4000
Deputy Chief of Staff for Governor Jeannie Haddaway Riccio
(410) 260-3969
Chief of Staff for Governor Matt Clark
(410) 974-5154

Delaware: Federal

US Senator Tom Carper
202-224-2441
US Senator Chris Coons
202-224-5042
US Representative Lisa Blunt Rochester
202-225-4165

Delaware: State Legislators

Senate President Pro Tempore David McBride
302-744-4167
Senate Majority Leader Margaret Rose Henry
302-744-4191
Senate Majority Whip Nicole Poore
302-744-4164
Senate Minority Leader Gary Simpson
302-744-4134
Senate Minority Whip Greg Lavelle
302-744-4135
Speaker of the House Peter Schwartzkopf
302-744-4351
House Majority Leader Valerie Longhurst
302-744-4351
House Majority Whip John Viola
302-744-4351
Speaker Pro Tempore Helene Keeley
302-577-8476
House Minority Leader Daniel Short
302-744-4172
House Minority Whip Deborah Hudson
302-744-4171

Delaware: State Officials

Governor John Carney
302-744-4101
Lt. Governor Bethany Hall-Long
302-744-4333
Delaware Attorney General Matt Denn
302-577-8400

Delaware: Local Officials

Sussex County Council President
Michael H. Vincent
302-629-2396
Sussex County Council, District 2
Samuel Wilson
302-856-2972
Sussex County Council, District 3
Irwin G. Burton III
302-313-5501
Sussex County Council, District 4
George B. Cole
302-542-4564
Sussex County Council, District 5
Robert B. Arlett
302-858-0211
Sussex County Council Attorney
J. Everett Moore, Jr.
302-424-2240
Sussex County Administrator
Todd Lawson
302-855-7700

Chat

Share your concerns with other concerned beachgoers.